How Bob Dylan’s brother saved Blood on the Tracks from ‘sounding too alike’

Bob Dylan’s brother was instrumental in the re-recording of Blood on the Tracks, and it sounds as though he saved the album.

Dylan’s 1975 masterpiece celebrated its fiftieth anniversary yesterday (January 20), and fans are celebrating earlier versions of his work, recorded in New York. These earlier tapes are stripped-back and rely on the acoustic works Dylan has found his footing in a decade prior. But his brother, David Zimmerman, told Dylan to re-record them, and the rest is history. Fans of the album are now sharing the New York Sessions and comparing it to the finished Blood on the Tracks project.

While most say they preferred the finished piece, many were quick to credit Zimmerman for prompting Dylan into re-recording the album with some instrumental variations, rather than the strict acoustic tones heard throughout. A Reddit user took to the Bob Dylan subreddit and wrote: “The New York Sessions of Blood on the Tracks present a more emotional, simple, acoustic, and intimate counterpart to the official release.

“The stripped-back instrumentation lets a larger spotlight shine on Dylan’s evocative writing. The raw quality of the production adds a layer of relatability and authenticity to the recording. Overall, this bootleg captures Dylan at his most personal, regretful, melancholic, and vulnerable, providing a fascinating alternative perspective on what I consider to be Dylan’s opus. While the sound quality of the official release is much more polished, the emotional depth and raw authenticity more than compensate for any technical imperfections.”

Those who listened to the acoustic renditions agreed Dylan’s brother was right to step in and save the album from its stripped-back appeal, but some argued the New York Sessions were far superior to the finished version released in 1975.

Thoughts on the New York sessions of Blood on the Tracks?
byu/YeetSkurt48 inbobdylan

One user wrote: “I think Dylan’s brother was right on them being too sad and slow. If you’re dealing with a breakup they’re even better than Blood on the Tracks.” Another added: “Love acoustic Bob but can see why his brother wanted him to rerecord some tracks from sounding too alike.”

But others found the similarities in tone to be electrifying even when just utilising acoustic instruments. One user wrote: “The compositions themselves are better but Blood on the Tracks wouldn’t be the masterstroke it is without the Minnesota tracks. Without them, you have ten songs that are all in the same key, all in the same open E tuning for nearly an hour. Individually they’re great, as one body of work they don’t have much staying power.”

Another added: “I prefer this version. I love the melancholic and rawer feel of these tracks, especially Idiot Wind. I see why he chose to re-record a lot of these songs tho. This version is not as immediate and probably wouldn’t have been as big of a hit.”